Bernat v. City of California City et al
| John Bernat |
| California City Police Department, Standish Knowlton, Eric Hurtado and City of California City |
| 1:2010cv00305 |
| February 19, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Jennifer L. Thurston |
| Oliver W. Wanger |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
121
ORDER Re Stipulation of the Parties Re Post-Trial Modication of Entry of Judgment and Dismissal of Action as to Defendant Knowlton, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 5/19/11. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
119
JUDGMENT, signed by Renee Gaumnitz, Courtroom Deputy to Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 5/2/11. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER on Plaintiff's 49 Motion in Limine No. 4, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 4/22/2011. (Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER GRANTING 37 Motion in Limine No. 2 by Defendants to Exclude all Evidence of, and Reference to, Other Crimes, Wrongs, or Acts by Defendants, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 4/20/2011. (Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
66
Memorandum Decision Regarding Defendants' 28 Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 3/21/2011. (Figueroa, O)
|
|
Filing
33
Courtroom Decorum. (Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER re Stipulation of the parties to extend the Expert Discovery ddl to 2/4/2011, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 1/18/2011. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
26
STIPULATION and ORDER of DISMISSAL with Prejudice as to the Second Cause of Action Alleging a Monell Claim, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 12/23/2010. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
24
STIPULATION and ORDER Granting Protective Order signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/20/2010. (Leon-Guerrero, A)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER GRANTING Stipulation to Extend Expert Designation and Discovery deadlines, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 10/13/2010. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion to Compel signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/12/2010. (Leon-Guerrero, A)
|
|
Filing
18
AMENDED Scheduling Conference Order, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 9/29/10: Discovery Cut-Off 12/10/10; Non-Dispositive Motion Filing DDL 12/27/10; Non-Dispositive Motion Hearing Date 2/4/10 at 9:00, Bakersfield; Dispositive Motion Filing DDL 1/10/11; Dispositive Motion Hearing Date 2/14/11 at 10:00, Ctrm 3; Settlement Conference Date 2/16/11 at 10:00, Bakersfield; Pre-Trial Conference Date 3/7/11 at 11:00, Ctrm 3; Trial Date 4/26/11 at 9:00, Ctrm 3 (JT-5 Days). (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
14
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 6/30/2010. (Discovery Cutt-Off: 12/10/2010, Non-Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline: 12/27/2010, Non-Dispositive Motion Hearing set 2/4/2010 at 9:00 AM in Bakersfield (JLT) before Ma gistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston, Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline: 1/10/2011, Dispositive Motion Hearing set for 2/14/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (OWW) before Judge Oliver W. Wanger, Settlement Conference set for 2/16/2011 at 10:00 AM in Ba kersfield (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston, Pretrial Conference set for 3/7/2011 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (OWW) before Judge Oliver W. Wanger, Jury Trial (5 Day Estimate)set for 4/26/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (OWW) before Judge Oliver W. Wanger.) (Gaumnitz, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
