WebQuest.com Inc. v. Hayward Industries
Plaintiff: WebQuest.com Inc.
Defendant: Hayward Industries
Case Number: 1:2010cv00306
Filed: February 19, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Amador
Presiding Judge: Gary S. Austin
Presiding Judge: Oliver W. Wanger
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 62 STIPULATION and ORDER of DISMISSAL with Prejudice signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 5/7/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
January 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 54 COURTROOM DECORUM. (Gaumnitz, R)
December 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 53 STIPULATION and ORDER To Extend Case Schedule, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 12/21/2010. (Discovery Cut-Off: 2/28/2011, Non-Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline: 3/11/2011, Last date to hear Non-Dispositive Motions 4/14/2011, Dispositive Moti on Filing Deadline: 4/11/2011, Last date to hear Dispositive Motions 5/16/2011, Settlement Conference set for 3/2/2011 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield at Truxtun (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston, Pretrial Conference set for 6/20/2011 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (OWW) before Judge Oliver W. Wanger, Jury Trial set for 7/26/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (OWW) before Judge Oliver W. Wanger.) (Gaumnitz, R)
November 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER Denying Hayward Industries, Inc's. Motion For Partial Judgment on the Pleadings; Denying Webquest.com Inc's. Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Counterclaims; Granting Webquest.com Inc's Motion to Strike all Exhibits From Defendant's Counterclaims Except for Exhibit A; and Denying Webquest.com, Inc's Motion for Sanctions, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 11/19/2010. (Gaumnitz, R)
November 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 47 MEMORANDUM DECISION Regarding Motion For Judgment on the Pleadings 25 ; Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim 30 ; and Motion for Sanctions 29 ; signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 11/8/2010. (Defendant shall lodge a formal order consistent with this decision within five (5) days following electronic service of this decision by the clerk. Plaintiff shall file an amendedcomplaint within fifteen (15) days of the filing of the order.Defendant shall file a response within fifteen (15) days ofreceipt of the amended complaint.) (Gaumnitz, R)
October 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER GRANTING Hayward's request for extension of page limit on its combined briefing, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 10/12/2010. (Kusamura, W)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WebQuest.com Inc. v. Hayward Industries
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WebQuest.com Inc.
Represented By: Michael Lawrence Rodenbaugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hayward Industries
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?