Haney v. Rouch, et al
Plaintiff: Bruce Patrick Haney
Defendant: Rouch, J. Moon and C. Schutt
Case Number: 1:2010cv00457
Filed: March 15, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
Presiding Judge: Lawrence J. O'Neill
Presiding Judge: Dennis L. Beck
Nature of Suit: Civil Detainee
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 37 FINDINGS And RECOMMENDATIONS To Grant Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment And To Dismiss Action, With Prejudice (Doc. 31 ), Objections Due Within Fifteen Days (Doc. 31 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 12/4/2012. F&R's referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 12/20/2012. (Fahrney, E)
July 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 33 AMENDED SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER and Notice and Warning of Requirements for Opposing Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 19 , 31 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 7/23/12. (Hellings, J)
December 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 12/7/2011 granting 27 Motion to withdraw motion to compel and withdrawing 26 Motion to Compel. (Lundstrom, T)
May 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER Dismissing Claims Found To Be Not Cognizable, and Defendant Associated with Such Claims, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 5/13/11. Defendant C. Schutt is Dismissed. (Verduzco, M)
February 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to Either File Amended Complaint OR Notify Court of Willingness to Proceed Only on Cognizable Claims, signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 2/18/11: Amended Complaint/Notice due within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Rights Complaint Form)(Hellings, J)
March 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Eastern District of California. Motions terminated: 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Bruce P. Haney. Signed by Judge James Ware on 3/1/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2010)[Transferred from cand on 3/15/2010.]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haney v. Rouch, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bruce Patrick Haney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rouch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Moon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. Schutt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?