Chapman v. Valero California Retail Company et al
| Byron Chapman |
| Valero California Retail Company and Janet B. Pierucci |
| 1:2010cv00758 |
| April 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Sacramento |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
Stipulation for Dismissal and ORDER Thereon, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/20/2010. CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/8/2010. This Court ORDERS the parties, no later than January 10, 2011, to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety, or to show good cause why the action has not been dismissed. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER to DISMISS Defendant, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/29/10: This Court DISMISSES this action without prejudice as to Defendant Janet B. Pierucci, trustee of various trusts; This Court DIRECTS the clerk NOT to close this action.(Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER continued the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 8/5/2010 to 9/8/2010 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (GSA) before Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/27/2010. (Kusamura, W)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
