Cato v. Avila et al
| James Cato, Jr. |
| T. Avila, J. Kavanaugh, D. L. Patterson, B. J. Johnson, F. R. Rodriguez, M. S. Patrick, B. F. England, J. A. Dumont, I. Bueno and W. Brumbaugh |
| 1:2010cv00793 |
| May 5, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Michael J. Seng |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
115
ORDER Closing Case in Light of Voluntery Dismissal with Prejudice and Order Denying as Moot All Other Pending Motions, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 03/07/2014. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER DENYING Motion for Appointment of Counsel 100 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/24/13: Motion is denied without prejudice. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS And Denying Defendant Kavanaugh's Motion For Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 80 , 95 ), signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/10/2013. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
95
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS for Denial of Defendant Kavanaugh's Motion for Summary Judgment 80 (FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE), signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/25/13: Matter referred to Judge Ishii. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER ADOPTING 88 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING 58 , 59 , 60 , 62 , 72 , 75 Plaintiff's Motions for Injunctive Relief, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 11/21/2012. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER Denying Miscellaneous Motions 64 , 82 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/24/12. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 65 Motion to Extend Time to File a Notice of Appeal as Moot and Denying Plaintiff's 68 Motion for a Certificate of Appealability, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 9/17/12. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER DENYING 38 and 54 Plaintiff's Discovery Motions without predjudice; ORDER DIRECTING Defendants to Respond within twenty days, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 08/20/2012. (20) Day Deadline (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER DENYING 61 Motion to Appoint Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 08/08/2012. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER Granting Defendants' 48 Request for Leave to Depose Plaintiff by Video Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 04/25/2012. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
47
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS for Denial of Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration 40 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 4/20/12: Matter referred to Judge Ishii.(Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER DENYING Motions for Issuance of Subpoena Duces Tecum and Request for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum as Premature 35 , 44 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 4/13/12. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER DENYING 25 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration and GRANTING 16 & 26 Plaintiff's Motions to Amend, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/21/2012. Amended Complaint Due Within Thirty Days. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER DENYING 19 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/16/2011. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER Directing the Clerk to Return 3 7 Materials signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 03/02/2011. (Flores, E)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
