Aneesah Hasan vs. U.S. Bank NA, et al
| Aneesah Hasan |
| U.S. Bank, NA, Litton Loan Servicing, LP, Quickloan Funding, Inc., Bank of America Home Loans, Countrywide Home Loans, Lasalle Bank, NA and Credit-Based Asset Servicing and Securitization, LLC |
| 1:2010cv00862 |
| May 14, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Oliver W. Wanger |
| Foreclosure |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER Granting Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiff's Complaint And Dismissing All Claims Without Prejudice, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 10/5/2010. This Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and DISMISSES Plaintiff's Complaint without prejudice. CASE CLOSED.(Scrivner, E)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER Dismissing Complaint With Prejudice as to Defendants Litton Loan Services LP and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 9/15/2010. Litton Loan Servicing, LP and U.S. Bank, NA terminated. (Esteves, C)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 7 Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 7/29/2010. (Bradley, A)
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Re: Unopposed Motions To Dismiss 5 , To Strike 6 and To Expunge Lis Pendes 7 , signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 7/26/2010. (Gaumnitz, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
