Gallagher v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Patrick Gallagher |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2010cv00942 |
| May 25, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Sheila K. Oberto |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/29/2012 adopting 40 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and granting 32 , 35 Motion for Attorney Fees. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
40
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that The Motion for Attorney's Fees 32 be GRANTED. Matter referred to Judge Ishii; Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days of service of this recommendation; signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/2/2012. (Timken, A)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER for Supplemental Statement. Plaintiff's counsel shall file a supplemental statement on or before August 30, 2012, indicating whether there is an error in the motion for attorneys' fees or set forth reasons why Plaintiff is not entitled to a $7,000 off-set for EAJA fees previously awarded. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/24/2012. (Timken, A)
|
|
Filing
31
STIPULATION and ORDER Awarding Attorney Fees Under The Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) 26 , signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/4/12. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
22
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 , Social Security Complaint filed by Patrick Gallagher, recommending that Plaintiff's appeal from the administrative decision of the Commissioner of Social Security be REVERSED and the case REMANDED to the ALJ to make additional findings consistent with this order. Matter referred to Judge Wanger; Objections to F&R due within fifteen (15) days after being served with this Findings and Recommendation; signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/9/2011. (Timken, A)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER GRANTING 17 Motion for Extension signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 2/23/2011.(Timken, A)
|
|
Filing
15
STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for an extension of time for plaintiff to file his opening brief; filing deadline set for 1/21/2011 for receipt of same; order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/23/2010. (Rooney, M)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER GRANTING 3 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 5/26/2010. (Bradley, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gallagher v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Patrick Gallagher | |
| Represented By: | Sengthiene Bosavanh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
