Benge v. Sprueill et al
Justin Benge |
Officer Sprueill, C. Cromwell, City of Modesto, John Doe and Richard Roe |
1:2010cv00978 |
May 28, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Stanislaus |
Lawrence J. O'Neill |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/20/2012. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 38 ORDER to Extend Deadline to Dismiss Action, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/28/11. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 36 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/20/11. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 35 ORDER After Settlement, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/17/2011. (Kusamura, W) |
Filing 19 ORDER on defendant City of Modesto's Motion to Strike Immaterial Claims from Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, document 15 . The Court DISMISSES plaintiff's claims based on Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment due process violations. T he Court FURTHER ORDERS defendants to file an answer to the FAC; case management deadline set for 11/8/2010 for receipt of same; (motion hearing currently noticed for 11/3/2010 is VACATED); order signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/21/2010. (Rooney, M) |
Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/2/2010. (Sant Agata, S) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.