Lukenbill v. Department of the United States Air Force et al
| Kathryn A. Lukenbill |
| Department of the United States Air Force, Office of Special Investigation, 95th Services and Non Appropriated Funds, Edwards Air Force Base, Ca |
| 1:2010cv01003 |
| June 4, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER DISREGARDING FILING 19 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/30/2020. (Hall, S)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER GRANTING 9 Motion to Dismiss; ORDERED that this Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this action against the Federal Defendants and DIRECTS the Clerk to enter Judgment against Plaintiff Kathryn A. Lukenbill and In Favor of Defendants the Department of the United States Air Force, Office of Special Investigation, 95th Services, Non-Appropriated Funds and Edwards Air Force Base, CA, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 09/16/2010. CLOSED CASE(Martin, S)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER Of RECUSAL, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/27/2010. Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto recused. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck for all further proceedings. All future pleadings filed with the court shall use the following case number: 1:10-cv-01003-LJO-DLB. (Scrivner, E)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
