Esparza, et al. v. The Burlington Insurance Company
Esparza Enterprises, Inc. and Luis M. Esparza |
The Burlington Insurance Company |
1:2010cv01079 |
June 15, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Kern |
Lawrence J. O'Neill |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 SUMMARY JUDGMENT DECISION 20 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/5/11. Motion for Summary Judgment Granted; October 25, 2011 Pretrial Conference and December 12, 2011 Trial Vacated. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 25 ORDER TO TAKE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION UNDER SUBMISSION signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on August 4, 2011. Motion Hearing currently set for 8/10/2011 is VACATED. (Lira, I) |
Filing 19 ORDER Amending the Scheduling Order signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/9/2011. Case Management Deadline: 7/8/2011. (Leon-Guerrero, A) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION and ORDER to Continue Settlement Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/23/2010. The Settlement Conference is RESET for 2/9/2011 at 09:00 AM in Bakersfield at 1200 Truxtun (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. The parties are reminded to submit their individual confidential settlement conference statements to Judge Thurston one week before the conference date. (Leon-Guerrero, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.