Em v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Savuth Em
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2010cv01414
Filed: August 6, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Fresno
Presiding Judge: Sheila K. Oberto
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 5/10/2012 adopting 30 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and granting 27 Motion for Attorney Fees. (Lundstrom, T)
April 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that the motion for attorney's fees 27 be granted. Matter referred to Judge O'Neill; Objections to F&R due with seven (7) days of service of this recommendation; signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/30/2012. (Timken, A)
March 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS That Plaintiff's Application for an Award of EAJA Fees Be Granted in the Amount of $3,476.34 28 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/23/12. (Hellings, J)
March 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 28 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that plaintiff's application for an award of attorney's fees be granted in the amount of $3,476.34; that plaintiff be awarded $1,575.54 for time expended by Ms. Bosavanh; that plaintiff be awarded $1,900.80 for time expended by Mr. Wilborn; and, that plaintiff should be paid in accordance with Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). Matter referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill with objections to findings and recommendations within 15 days of service; order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/2/2012. (Rooney, M)
November 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER that any supplemental requests for EAJA fees be submitted within 20 days signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/21/2011. (Timken, A)
March 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 17 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER OF VOLUNTARY REMAND AND DISMISSAL of Case, with Directions to Clerk to Enter Judgment; REMANDED CASE to Commissioner of Social Security; Copy of remand order sent to other court, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 03/04/2011. CASE CLOSED (Martin, S)
February 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STIPULATION and ORDER to extend time signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 2/15/2011. (Timken, A)
August 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING 3 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 8/6/2010. (Marrujo, C)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Em v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Savuth Em
Represented By: Sengthiene Bosavanh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?