Funtanilla v. Thomas, et al.
Gregorio C. Funtanilla, Jr. |
Cynthia -- Thomas, Olga Medrano and Maxine Martinez |
1:2010cv01433 |
August 9, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Kings |
Michael J. Seng |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER DISMISSING 1 Action without Prejudice for Failure to Pay Filing Fee signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 3/14/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 8 ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; Dismissing Plaintiff's Dental Care Claim And Revoking Plaintiff's In Forma Pauperis Status (ECF Nos. 2 & 6 ), Plaintiff Shall Pay $350 Filing Fee Within Thirty Days Or Case Will Be Dismissed Without Prejudice, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 2/2/2011. (Filing Fee Deadline: 3/7/2011) (Fahrney, E) |
Filing 6 FINDINGS And RECOMMENDATION That Plaintiff's Claims Regarding Dental Care Be Dismissed As Duplicative And That Plaintiff's In Forma Pauperis Status Be Revoked (ECF No. 2 ), Objections (If Any) Due Within Thirty Days, signed by Magistrate J udge Michael J. Seng on 12/6/2010. The Court RECOMMENDS the following: Plaintiff's dental care claim be DISMISSED as duplicative; Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status be REVOKED; Plaintiff be ordered to pay the filing fee for this case in full within thirty days. F&R's referred to Judge Oliver W. Wanger; Objections to F&R due by 1/10/2011. (Fahrney, E) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.