Martinez v. Kings County, et al.
| Luis Roberto Martinez |
| Kings County, California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation, Anthony Enenmoh, L. Schaper, K. Englert, P. Linihan, Tami Arden, P. Pascua and Martinez |
| 1:2010cv01569 |
| August 31, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Dennis L. Beck |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER CLOSING CASE in Light of 45 Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice and DENYING 44 Request to take Deposition as MOOT signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/23/2015. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER Finding Cognizable Claim and Directing Defendant Arden to File a Responsive Pleading to Second Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 10/15/2014. ( 30-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
29
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 16 Be Granted, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 8/24/12. Referred to Judge Ishii. Objections, If Any, Due Within Fourteen Days. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER Providing Plaintiff Opportunity to Withdraw Opposition and File Amended Opposition in Light of Separately-Issued Notice, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 7/18/12. 30-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
