Quinn v. Fresno County Sheriff et al
| James Loran Quinn |
| Fresno County Sheriff, Fresno County Probation Department, David Alanis, Leonard Richert, Fresno County District Attorney, Fresno County Jail, Fresno Police Department and County of Fresno |
| 1:2010cv01617 |
| September 7, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Sandra M. Snyder |
| Oliver W. Wanger |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
235
ORDER Vacating Judgment for Clarity of the Record 198 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/19/15. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
234
ORDER on Stipulated Dismissal, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/10/14: The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this action. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
232
ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO EXTEND DISMISS ACTION AND TO RESOLVE POTENTIAL MEDICAL LIENS (Docs. 230, 231) signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on November 22, 2013. (Munoz, I)
|
|
Filing
230
AMENDED 229 Order After 228 Settlement, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/15/2013. Notice to Dismiss by 11/22/2013. (Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
226
ORDER on The Parties' 211 212 Motions In Limine, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/9/2013. (Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
213
STIPULATION TO THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE COURT'S PREVIOUS ORDER GRANTING CERTAIN OF THE PARTIES PREVIOUSLY FILED MOTIONS IN LIMINE AND ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on September 11, 2013. (Munoz, I)
|
|
Filing
208
FURTHER SCHEDULING ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on August 7, 2013. (Munoz, I)
|
|
Filing
207
ORDER Regarding Settlement Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/20/2013. (Herman, H)
|
|
Filing
206
STIPULATION and ORDER Setting Settlement Conference: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE set for August 14, 2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/17/2013. (Herman, H)
|
|
Filing
204
ORDER FOLLOWING TRIAL SETTING CONFERENCE signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on June 14, 2013. (Munoz, I)
|
|
Filing
202
ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL SETTING CONFERENCE for for 6/14/2013 at 08:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on May 29, 2013. (Munoz, I)
|
|
Filing
198
JUDGMENT on the Special Verdict, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/11/13. CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
197
ORDER on the parties' 188 190 Motions for Reconsideration, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/8/2013. (Filing Deadline: 3/29/2013) (Figueroa, O)
|
|
Filing
186
ORDER on the Parties' Post-Trial Motions (Docs. 174 , 175 ), Signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/14/2012. The parties shall file a joint proposed form of final judgment consistent with this order by no later than 12/21/2012. (Arellano, S.)
|
|
Filing
160
SECOND DECISION ON JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND VERDICT FORM signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on August 9, 2012. (Munoz, I)
|
|
Filing
156
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE MOTIONS TO AMEND THE PRETRIAL ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on August 3, 2012. (Munoz, I)
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO AMEND THE PRETRIAL ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on July 27, 2012. Response due by noon on Monday, July 30, 2012. (Munoz, I)
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 8 (Doc. 111) signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on July 25, 2012. (Munoz, I)
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER ON THE PARTIES' MOTIONS IN LIMINE 110 111 signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on July 20, 2012. (Munoz, I)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER on Defendants' 104 Motion for Reconsideration signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/10/2012. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER on Defendant's 68 Motion for Summary Judgment; ORDER GRANTS the County Summary Judgment with respect to Plaintiff's Monell claim; Order DENIES Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment in all other respects, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 06/06/2012. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' EX PARTE MOTION TO EXCEED REPLY PAGE LIMIT signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on May 16, 2012. (Munoz, I)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER GRANTING 48 HOUR EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on May 7, 2012. (Munoz, I)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER Amending the Scheduling Order to Extend Time For Expert Discovery, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/9/2012. (Scheduling Orders 47 62 AMENDED as follows: The expert discovery cutoff date is extended from 4/6/2012, to 5/9/2012. No further extensions of the expert discovery cut-off will be granted. Counsel for both parties are expected to meet and confer regarding a proposed date to complete thedeposition of Plaintiffs non-retained expert witness Dr. Lorie Decarvalho within this time frame.) (Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
62
STIPULATION and ORDER Amending The Scheduling Order to Exten the Time for Expert Discovery, Designation of Expert Witnesses and Rule 26 Reports: (1) The date for designating expert witnesses, and production of their Rule 26 expert reports is extended from 3/9/12 to March 14, 2012; (2) The expert discovery cutoff date is extened from 3/9/12 to April 6, 2012; (3) Defendants' ex parte application to amend the scheduling order [Doc. 60] is DENIED as moot. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/9/2012. (Herman, H)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for an extension of time to file their expert witness designations; said designations, including any supplemental designations, are to be served no later than 3/9/2012; order signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/3/2012. (Rooney, M)
|
|
Filing
49
STIPULATION and PROTECTIVE ORDER Authorizing Limited Disclosure Confidential County of Fresno Public Health Department and Fresno County Sheriff's Department Policies, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 7/26/2011. (Herman, H)
|
|
Filing
44
STIPULATION Extending Time to File Joint Scheduling Conference Report and ORDER Thereon signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 6/17/2011.(Joint Scheduling Conference Report Deadline: 6/21/2011) (Figueroa, O)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 6/1/2011. (Plaintiffs medical care claim under section 1983 against Defendant ALANIS is DISMISSED, without prejudice; Plainti ffs first cause of action is DISMISSED, with prejudice; Plaintiffs second cause of action is DISMISSED, with prejudice; Plaintiffs third cause of action is DISMISSED, without prejudice; Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within fourteen (14) d ays of service of the Memorandum Decision; and Defendants shall file a response within ten (10) days of service of the amended complaint. On May 20, 2011, Plaintiff failed to timely file an amended complaint within 14 days of service of the Memorandum Decision, and as such, the Court hereby rules as follows: Plaintiffs third cause of action is DISMISSED, with prejudice.) (Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 5/19/2011. (Plaintiffs medical care claim under section 1983 against Defendant ALANIS is DISMISSED, without prejudice; Plaint iffs first cause of action is DISMISSED, with prejudice; Plaintiffs second cause of action is DISMISSED, with prejudice; Plaintiffs third cause of action is DISMISSED, without prejudice; Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within fourteen (14) days of service of the Memorandum Decision; and Defendants shall file a response within ten (10) days of service of the amended complaint.)(Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM DECISION REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS 30 , signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 5/5/2011. ( IT IS ORDERED: 1) Plaintiffs medical care claim under Section 1983 (thirteenth cause of action) against Defendant Alanis isDISMISSED WITHOUT PRE JUDICE; 2)Plaintiffs first cause of action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 3)Plaintiffs second cause of action is DISMISSED WITHPREJUDICE; 4)Plaintiffs third cause of action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 5) Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint wi thin fourteen (14) days of electronic service of this Memorandum Decision; Defendants shall file a esponse within ten (10) days of service of the amended complaint, and 6) Defendants shall submit a form of order consistent with this Memorandum Decision within five (5) days of electronic service of this decision.)(Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Corrected Second Amended Complaint, Signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 3/3/2011. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within fourteen (14) days of service of this order. Defendants shall file a response within ten (10) days of service of the amended complaint. (Arellano, S.)
|
|
Filing
25
STIPULATION Extending Time to File Third Amended Complaint to March 7th and ORDER Thereon signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 2/17/2011. (Amended Complaint due by 3/7/2011; Defendants will file their response within ten (10) days of service of the amended document) (Figueroa, O)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM, DECISION regarding Motion to Dismiss 10 , signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 2/8/2011. (Kusamura, W)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
