US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Fisher Nut Company
| US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
| Fisher Nut Company |
| 1:2010cv01794 |
| September 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Stanislaus |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Sheila K. Oberto |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
CONSENT DECREE, ORDER, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 5/6/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER After Settlement (Doc. 17 ), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/7/2011. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER DENYING stipulated request 15 and ORDERING parties to file notice of settlement. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/5/2011. (Timken, A)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART 13 parties' stipulated request to vacate all scheduling dates signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/22/2011. Defendant shall file an answer on or before April 12, 2011; The Scheduling Conference remains set for April 19, 2011, at 9:45 a.m.; Alternatively, the parties may file a Notice of Settlement pursuant to Local Rule 160(a) on or before the April 12, 2011, deadline to respond to the complaint.(Timken, A)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER GRANTING in Part, DENYING in Part the parties' stipulated request for continuance, 11 . The Defendant shall file an answer on or before March 31, 2011; and the Scheduling Conference currently set for March 31, 2011, is VACATED and RESET to 4/19/2011 at 09:45 AM in Courtroom 8 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 2/7/2011. (Timken, A)
|
|
Filing
10
STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING continuance of Scheduling Conference. The Scheduling Conference currently set for 3/10/2011 is CONTINUED to 3/31/2011 at 09:45 AM in Courtroom 8 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/27/2011. (Timken, A)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER GRANTING stipulation to continue scheduling conference. The Scheduling Conference currently set for 1/11/2011 is CONTINUED to 3/10/2011 at 09:15 AM in Courtroom 8 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Defendant has until March 1, 2011, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/3/2011. (Timken, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Fisher Nut Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission | |
| Represented By: | Dana C. Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Fisher Nut Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
