Davis v. Social Service Coordinators, Inc.
Lisa Davis |
Social Services Coordinators, LLC and Social Service Coordinators, Inc. |
1:2010cv02372 |
December 20, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Fresno |
Sheila K. Oberto |
Oliver W. Wanger |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 132 ORDER GRANTING 121 Defendant's Motion to Change Venue and ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Southern District of Florida signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/16/2013. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 129 ORDER Granting Stipulated Request to Seal 125 , 126 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/24/13. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 120 STANDING ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on June 19, 2013. (Munoz, I) |
Filing 113 ORDER SETTING Scheduling Conference set for 4/10/2013, at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The joint scheduling report shall be filed by the parties by no later than April 3, 2013. Telephonic appearanc es for the scheduling conference are APPROVED and ENCOURAGED. The joint scheduling report should indicate in the caption whether counsel will appear telephonically. All parties appearing telephonically shall coordinate one conference call to the Court at (559) 499-5790 at the time and date for the conference. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/7/2013. (Timken, A) |
Filing 104 ORDER re CLASS NOTICE ISSUES. Plaintiff's request that Defendant be ordered to post notice of the lawsuit at its Miami Lakes facility is DENIED; Plaintiff's request for an in-person joint meeting with putative class members during the no tice period is DENIED; No later than February 15, 2013, the parties shall telephonically meet and confer to discuss any additional notice-process issues; and no later than February 15, 2013, if the parties determine a status conference is unnecessary, they shall file a stipulation with the Court requesting that the February 20, 2013, status conference be vacated. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/30/2013. (Timken, A) |
Filing 78 ORDER Adopting 73 Findings and Recommendations that Plaintiff's 47 Motion to Conditionally Certify Class be Granted, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/14/12. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 73 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 1) Plaintiff's Motion for Conditional Class Certification 47 be Granted; 2) SSC should be ordered to provide Plaintiff's counsel with contact information for the putative class members; 3) P laintiff's request to notify the putative class members via U.S. mail should be GRANTED IN PART with the amendments noted above; 4) Putative class members should have sixty (60) days from circulation of the notice of pendency in which to opt in to this action; and 5) Plaintiff's counsel should be appointed to represent the collective class members. Matter referred to Judge O'Neill; Objections to F&R due with seven (7) days of service of this recommendation; signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/30/2012. (Timken, A) |
Filing 70 ORDER WITHDRAWING 68 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. ORDER PERMITTING Defendants to file a response or an opposition to 69 Plaintiff's supplemental Motion for Conditional Class Certification. 1) The August 28, 2012, Findings a nd Recommendations are WITHDRAWN; 2) Defendants may file a supplemental response or opposition to Plaintiff's supplemental motion on or before September 28, 2012; 3) On or before October 5, 2012, Plaintiff may file a reply to any response or opp osition filed by Defendants; 4) No further briefing shall be permitted absent prior leave of the Court; and 5) To the extent the parties are unwilling to stipulate to notice to the class proposed in Plaintiff's supplemental motion, the undersign ed will issue new Findings and Recommendations based on the parties' original and additional briefing, to which the parties will be afforded an opportunity to object once the F&Rs are pending before District Judge O'Neill. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/18/2012. (Timken, A) |
Filing 68 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 47 Plaintiff's Motion for Conditional Class Certification be DENIED without Prejudice. Matter referred to Judge O'Neill; Objections to F&R due within twenty-one (21) days of service of this recommendation; signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/27/2012. (Timken, A) |
Filing 62 ORDER on 60 Defendant's Motion to Strike. Defendants' motion to strike shall be construed as objections to Plaintiff's reply brief; Plaintiff may file a response to Defendants' objections on or before June 29, 2012. No further briefing shall be filed by the parties in relation to Plaintiff's motion to certify a class without prior leave of the court; and Defendants' objections to Plaintiff's reply brief and any response by Plaintiff will be considered in conjunction with the motion to certify a class, currently set to be heard on July 18, 2012. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/26/2012. (Timken, A) |
Filing 61 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Request to Seal Documents, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/21/2012. (Kusamura, W) |
Filing 50 ORDER GRANTING In Part and DENYING In Part Plaintiff's Request to Seal Document, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/29/2012. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 49 ORDER allowing submission of supplemental statement setting forth good cause to seal documents. On or before May 15, 2012, Defendants may submit an optional statement in support of Plaintiff's request to seal setting forth good cause to seal the documents or portions of documents at issue; and any statement submitted by Defendants should not be filed, but should be emailed to the Court at skoorders@caed.uscourts.gov and should be served on Plaintiff. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/11/2012. (Timken, A) |
Filing 45 STIPULATION and ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 2/29/2012. (Rooney, M) |
Filing 40 ORDER DENYING, without prejudice, the parties' request for a protective order. If the parties would like the Court to consider their stipulation and request, they are directed to refile a stipulation and proposed order that complies with L.R. 141.1(c) and correct the deficiences as set forth in this order; order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/24/2012. (Rooney, M) |
Filing 38 SCHEDULING ORDER. 1) Any motions or stipulations requesting leave to amend the pleadings must be filed no later than March 1, 2012; 2) The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) on or before Nove mber 30, 2011; 3) Class certification discovery shall be completed by no later than March 30, 2012; 4) The motion for class certification shall be filed by no later than April 30, 2012; 5) Any opposition shall be filed by no later than May 31, 2012; 6) Any reply brief shall be filed by no later than June 15, 2012; 7) The motion for class certification shall be heard by no later than July 18, 2012, at 8:15 a.m. before the Honorable District Judge Lawrence O'Neill in Courtroom 4; 8) Following the District Court's decision on Plaintiff's motion for classcertification, the Court, as necessary, will set a status conference to set further scheduling dates and discuss issues related to discovery raised by the parties at the initial scheduling conference. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/10/2011. (Timken, A) |
Filing 24 MEMORANDUM, DECISION and ORDER RE: Motion to Amend 18 , signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 7/28/2011. (Kusamura, W) |
Filing 17 ORDER RE; Striking Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint; VACATING the April 4, 2011 hearing; Setting Briefing schedule; oppositiion ddl 4/20/2011, Responses due by 5/17/2011, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 3/31/2011. (Kusamura, W) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.