Alonso-Prieto v. Pierce, et al.
Raul Ernest Alonso-Prieto |
B Pierce, John Doe, Jane Doe and County of Kern |
1:2011cv00024 |
January 6, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Kern |
Michael J. Seng |
Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 91 ORDER Denying as Moot 90 Motion to Continue in Forma Pauperis Status on Appeal, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/6/15. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 83 ORDER Regarding 82 Response to Order to Show Cause, Pretrial Statement, and Notice of Appeal, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 12/15/14. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 80 ORDER DISMISSING Action with Prejudice for Failure to Obey Court Orders and Failure to Prosecute signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 12/9/2014. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 79 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 75 Motion for Clarification signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 12/9/2014. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 73 ORDER To SHOW CAUSE Why Case Should Not Be Dismissed With Prejudice For Failure To Comply With Court Order (ECF No. 60 ), Fourteen (14) Day Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/17/2014. Show Cause Response due by 12/3/2014.(Fahrney, E) |
Filing 71 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motions to Compel, for Reconsideration, Recusal and Transfer of Venue re 69 , 70 ; ORDER Taking Under Submission Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Action and Directing Defendant to Respond within Fourteen Days re 69 , 70 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/30/14. Fourteen-Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 67 ORDER ASSIGNING CASE re: Presiding Judge, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 7/23/2014. The New Case Number is 1:11-cv-00024-MJS (PC). (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 65 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion For Reconsideration (ECF No. 59 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 6/30/2014. (Fahrney, E) |
Filing 58 ORDER Denying 57 Plaintiff's Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 5/9/14. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 56 ORDER ADOPTING 53 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, IN FULL; ORDER DENYING 32 Motion to Dismiss, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 02/21/2014. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 55 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Discovery Motion (ECF No. 54 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/30/2014. (Fahrney, E) |
Filing 53 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/22/2014 recommending that 32 MOTION to DISMISS be DENIED. Referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii; Objections to F&R due by 2/10/2014. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 52 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Motion to Modify Discovery and Scheduling Order 51 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/10/14: Discovery Cut-Off Date - 03/10/2014; Dispositive Motion Deadline - 05/19/2014. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 20 ORDER Denying Miscellaneous Motions (ECF Nos. 18 , 19 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 9/27/2012. (Fahrney, E) |
Filing 14 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Miscellaneous Motions 12 , 13 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/5/12. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 7 ORDER Granting 6 Motion to Amend the Complaint, Amended Complaint due by 4/30/2011, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 03/07/2011. (Flores, E) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting 2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/10/2011. (Attachments: # 1 IFP Application) (Lundstrom, T) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.