Barrow v. Clark et al
| Raekubian A. Barrow |
| S. Martinez, Ken Clark, T. Akin and J. Ourique |
| 1:2011cv00078 |
| January 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Sandra M. Snyder |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER DISMISSING Action as Duplicative of Case Number 1:10-cv-00154-MJS PC, re 1 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/3/11. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of CA (Sacramento), FORTHWITH. All pending motions are TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 1/11/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2011) Modified on 1/14/2011 (jlm, COURT STAFF). Modified on 1/14/2011 (jlm, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from cand on 1/18/2011.]
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong DENYING 8 Motion to Appoint Counsel (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2010) Modified on 12/9/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from cand on 1/18/2011.]
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong DENYING 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 10/27/10 (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2010) Modified on 10/28/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from cand on 1/18/2011.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
