Gomez v. Gonzalez, et al.
| Trinidad Gomez |
| Fernando Gonzalez, C. Wood, - Farmer, D. Rhodes, M. Genova, J. Lundy and Appeals Coordinator |
| 1:2011cv00087 |
| January 19, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Gary S. Austin |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER GRANTING Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 41 15 ; ORDER DISMISSING Action In Its Entirety Without Prejudice; ORDER DIRECTING Clerk to Close File, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/3/11: The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). (CASE CLOSED) (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING 12 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and ORDER DENYING 10 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/14/2011. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER DENYING 9 Plaintiff's Motion to Consolidate Two Actions signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 5/23/2011. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER to Submit Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis OR Pay Filing Fee Within 45 Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/27/11: Motion for IFP/Filing Fee due by 3/16/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Application for IFP)(Hellings, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
