Margosian et al v. Margosian et al
| Aron Margosian and Carrie Margosian |
| Jeanette Pacheco, Kurt Covington, Erin Bushell, Bank of the West, Patrick Schoenburg, Loren Schoenburg, Marge Schoenburg, Westmark Group, Mark Burrell, Dale Margosian and Jeffrey L Covey |
| 1:2011cv00137 |
| January 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Tulare |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Sandra M. Snyder |
| Other Fraud |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
STIPULATION to REMAND Case Back to Tulare County Superior Court, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/21/11: Certified Copy of Remand Order sent to Tulare County Superior Court. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER TO VACATE HEARING signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/23/2011. March 15, 2011 Hearing on Bank of the West, Curt Covington and Erin Bushell's Motion to Dismiss is VACATED. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER on Schoenburg Defendants' F.R.Civ.P. 12 Motion to Dismiss, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/18/11: This action is DISMISSED with prejudice against Mr. and Mrs. Schoenburg; The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Defendants Loren Schoenburg and Marge Schoenburg and against Plaintiffs Aron Margosian and Carrie Margosian. (Hellings, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
