Bondurant v. Gonzalez et al
| Travis Bondurant |
| F. Gonzalez and T. Steadman |
| 1:2011cv00159 |
| January 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Gerald B. Cohn |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER Dismissing Action, With Prejudice, For Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief May Be Granted 33 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 4/23/12. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER Denying Motion For Appointment Of Counsel (Doc. 34 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 11/16/2011. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE for Failure to Comply the Court's July 28, 2011 28 Screening Order; Plaintiff must Show Cause or File an Amended Complaint by October 31, 2011 signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 10/3/2011. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motions for Reconsideration 26 , 27 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 9/2/11. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER Denying 22 Request for Entry of Default, Denying 21 Motion Requiring Defendants to Reply, Denying 20 Motion for Injunctive Relief, and Denying 15 Motion for Appointment of Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 6/16/11. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER DENYING 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 2/2/2011. (Sant Agata, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
