Earp v. County of Tulare et al
| Donny Y. Earp |
| County of Tulare and Physicians Assistant Henry |
| 1:2011cv00196 |
| February 3, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Tulare |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Michael J. Seng |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER Granting 22 Motion for Summary Judgment; Clerk of Court is Directed to Enter Judgment and Close Case signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 03/28/2012. CASE CLOSED. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
39
STIPULATION and ORDER to Continue Hearing on Defendant's Motion for Evidentiary Sanctions and Motion for Summary Judgement. Motion Hearing is set for 2/23/2012 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/2/2012. (Yu, L)
|
|
Filing
20
JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES; ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/11/2012. (Yu, L)
|
|
Filing
18
JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/2/2011. (Yu, L)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/31/2011. (Yu, L)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER on JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES REGARDING DISCLOSURE OF EXPERTS signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/26/2011. (Yu, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
