United States of America v. Briggs
| United States of America |
| Mike Briggs |
| 1:2011cv00424 |
| March 11, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Sheila K. Oberto |
| Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7402 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER to DISMISS and CLOSE CASE signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/25/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/12/2011 to STAY PROCEEDINGS. (Filing Deadline set for 11/14/2011 for Government to file a status report). (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Defendant Should Not be Held in Contempt and Sanctioned, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/8/2011. Show Cause Response due by 7/18/2011. This Court SETS a contempt hearing on Monday, July 15, 2011 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 (LJO) to rule on the contempt petition and to consider appropriate sanctions. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER for status report signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/3/2011. (Timken, A)
|
|
Filing
9
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 1) The IRS summons issued to Respondent, Mike Briggs, be ENFORCED as follows: a) Respondent be ordered to appear at the IRS offices at 2525 Capitol Street, Suite 205, Fresno, California 93721, before Rev enue Officer Evan Moses, or his designated representative, twenty-one (21) days after the issuance of the order, or at a later date to be set in writing by Revenue Officer Moses; b) That upon his appearance, Respondent be sworn, to give testimony, an d to produce for examining and copying the books, checks, records, papers and other data demanded by the summons; and c) That the examination of Respondent shall continue from day to day until completed. 2) Jurisdiction be RETAINED to enforce its order by its contempt power. Matter referred to Judge O'Neill; Objections to F&R due within ten (10) days after being served with these findings and recommendations; signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/18/2011. (Timken, A)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE re Enforcement of Internal Revenue Service Summons signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/22/2011. Show Cause Hearing set for 5/11/2011 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Timken, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Briggs | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Yoshinori H. T. Himel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Mike Briggs | |
| Represented By: | Stephen Mensel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
