Martinez v. Cate
| Daniel J. Martinez |
| Matthew Cate |
| 1:2011cv00572 |
| April 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Stanislaus |
| Michael J. Seng |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER DISMISSING CASE, any party may move to reopen the case for good cause, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 02/14/2019. CASE CLOSED(Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER regarding 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Daniel J. Martinez signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/12/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
45
CJA 20 APPOINTING ATTORNEY Gary Paul Burcham for Daniel J. Martinez signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 7/14/2017, Nunc Pro Tunc 7/13/2017. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER Appointing Attorney Lisa M. Sciandra for Daniel J. Martinez re Appeal #15-16433, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/1/16. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER DENYING 34 Motion for Reconsideration signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/29/2015. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
29
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that the Seventh Claim of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) be DENIED With Prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/3/2015. Referred to Judge Ishii. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER on 26 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION and REFERRING Matter to the Magistrate Judge signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/17/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
26
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending that the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be Denied with Prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 6/19/2014. Referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii. Objections to F&R due by 7/24/2014. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER DENYING 17 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/31/2012. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER Requiring Respondent to File Response signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/10/2012. 60-day deadline. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION, ORDER Denying Motion To Dismiss (Document # 12 & # 14 ), signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 4/27/2012. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
14
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending that the 12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Exhaust State Remedies be Denied signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/3/2012. Referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii. Objections to F&R due by 2/6/2012. (Sant Agata, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martinez v. Cate | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Daniel J. Martinez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Matthew Cate | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
