Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Sorondo et al
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant: Steven Castanon Sorondo and Starden, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2011cv00631
Filed: April 20, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Fresno
Presiding Judge: Lawrence J. O'Neill
Presiding Judge: Sheila K. Oberto
Nature of Suit: Cable/Satellite TV
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 553
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's request for the appointment of a registered process server, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/26/2014. (Timken, A)
April 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER for SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF and DECLARATION. Plaintiff shall supplement its request for appointment of a process server within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order; and if Plaintiff fails to supplement its request for the appointment of a process server within this time period, the request will be denied without prejudice. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/22/2014. (Timken, A)
September 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 14 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 13 Plaintiff's motion for default judgment be GRANTED; Judgment be entered in this action against Defendants Steven Castanon Sorondo, individually and dba The Lamp Post Bar, and Starden, Inc. dba The Lamp Post Bar as follows: a) $10,000 statutory damages for violation of 47 U.S.C. § 605; b) $ 2,000 enhanced statutory damages for violation of 47 U.S.C. § 605; and c) $900 for the tort of conversion. Matter referred to Judge O'Neill; Objections due withing fifteen (15) days of service of this recommendation; signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/9/2011. (Timken, A)
July 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER CONTINUING the initial scheduling conference. The Scheduling Conference currently set for 7/21/2011, is CONTINUED to 11/1/2011 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The Court notes that Plaintiff fi led its request for clerk's entry of default on July 15, 2011. Accordingly, it is hereby further ordered that Plaintiff's motion for default judgment shall be filed by no later than twenty-one (21) days after the filing of the clerk's entry of default. Should the motion for default judgment be granted, the scheduling conference shall be vacated. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/18/2011. (Timken, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Sorondo et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas Peter Riley, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven Castanon Sorondo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starden, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?