Armstrong v. Hedgpeth, et al.
| Brady K. Armstrong |
| Terronez, A Hedgpeth, L. Dileo, Spaeth, Rumsey, D. Hicks and Gomez |
| 1:2011cv00761 |
| May 13, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Gary S. Austin |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this Action be Dismissed Based on Plaintiff's Failure to Obey the Court's Order of August 25, 2014 re First 43 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/10/2014. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due within twenty (20) days. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 57 ; ORDER for This Action to Proceed Only Against Defendant Nurse Rumsey on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment Medical Claim; ORDER DISMISSING All Other Claims and Defendants, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/22/14: The Clerk is DIRECTED to reflect the dismissal of Defendants Dileo, Spaeth, Terronez, and Gomez from this action on the Court's docket; and This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings including initiation of service of process. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
57
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this Action Proceed Only Against Defendant Nurse Rumsey on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment Medical Claims, and That All Other Claims and Defendants be Dismissed re 43 First Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/9/2014. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER DENYING 51 Request for Court Order and Request for Extension of Time signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 5/23/2014. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER ADOPTING 44 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and ORDER DENYING 32 , 33 , 35 Plaintiff's Motions for Preliminary Injunctive Relief signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/2/2014. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER RESPONDING to Plaintiff's 41 Motion for Status; ORDER DENYING Request for Copies signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/6/2013. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
44
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Plaintiff's Motions for Preliminary Injunctive Relief (Docs. 32 , 33 , 35 ) be DENIED re 43 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/21/2013. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER for Clerk to Remove Complaint Filed on September 9, 2013 (Doc. 39 ) From This Action and Open New Case and ORDER for Clerk to File Complaint Lodged on September 10, 2013 (Doc. 40 ) as First Amended Complaint for This Action signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/20/2013. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER denying 28 Motion request for free copies signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/11/2013. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER Responding to 20 Plaintiff's Motion for Status of Case signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/30/2012. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
7
FINDINGS And RECOMMENDATIONS To Dismiss Case For Failure To Obey A Court Order (Doc. 3 ), Objections, If Any, Due In Thirty Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/14/2011. F&R's referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 8/18/2011. (Fahrney, E)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
