Omara v. Smith et al
Michael A. Omara |
Steven Smith, Jack St. Clair, Matthew Cate and J. Clark Kelso |
1:2011cv00812 |
May 18, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Fresno |
Dennis L. Beck |
Oliver W. Wanger |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/24/2012 adopting 30 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and REMANDING CASE to Tuolumne County Superior Court. A Certified Copy of remand order sent to Tuolumne County Superior Court. CASE CLOSED. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 30 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 15 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Be Granted In Part and Denied In Part re 1 Notice of Removal, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/20/2011. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due within twenty-one (21) days. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 29 ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of the Court to DISMISS: DEFENDANTS Matthew Cate and J. Clark Kelso pursuant to Plaintiff's NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 10/03/2011. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 22 ORDER GRANTING First 21 Motion to Extend Time to File a Response to Defendants' Motion and DENYNING 21 Motion for Copy of Defendants' Motion, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 7/26/2011. (Filing Deadline: 8/29/2011.) (Marrujo, C) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.