Jacobs v. Hubbard
George E. Jacobs, IV |
Susan Hubbard |
1:2011cv00934 |
June 9, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Kings |
Sheila K. Oberto |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 ORDER SUBSTITUTING Warden Dave Davey as Respondent; ORDER DENYING Petitioner's 31 Request for Appointment of Counsel; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Deny the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Deny Petitioner's 31 Request for an Evidentiary Hearing, Enter Judgment for Respondent, and Decline to Issue a Certificate of Appealability; Objections Deadline: Thirty (30) Days signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/8/2014. Referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii. Objections to F&R due by 1/12/2015. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 18 ORDER DEEMING Petitioner's 17 Status Report to be a Motion to Withdraw the First Amended Petition and to Proceed on the Claims Stated in the Original Petition; ORDER DISSOLVING the Stay of the Proceedings and GRANTING Petitioner's 17 Mo tion to Proceed on the Original Petition; ORDER DISMISSING Petitioner's State Law Claims; ORDER REQUIRING Respondent to File a Response to the 1 Petition; ORDER SETTING a Briefing Schedule; ORDER DIRECTING Clerk to Serve Documents on the Attorney General signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/27/2012. Clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the Petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. Consent or Decline due by 6/1/2012. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 14 ORDER Granting Petitioner's Motion to Amend the Petition to Withdraw Unexhausted Claims 13 ; ORDER Granting Petitioner's Motion for Stay and Abeyance 13 and Staying the Proceedings Pending Exhaustion of State Court Remedies; ORDER Directing Petitioner to File Status Reports Every Thirty (30) Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/9/11. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 10 ORDER DISCHARGING 6 Order to Show Cause; ORDER DENYING 9 Petitioner's Motion to Stay the Petition Pursuant to Rhines v. Weber; ORDER GRANTING Petitioner Thirty (30) Days to Withdraw Petitioner's Unexhausted Claims and Seek a Kelly Stay; and INFORMATIONAL ORDER to Petitioner Concerning Dismissal if Unexhausted Claims are Not Withdrawn, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/23/2011. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 6 ORDER to Petitioner to SHOW CAUSE in Thirty (30) Days Why The Petition Should Not Be Dismissed for Petitioner's Failure to Exhaust State Remedies, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/20/11: Petitioner is forewarned that failure to follow this order will result in dismissal of the petition pursuant to Local Rule 110. (Hellings, J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jacobs v. Hubbard | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Susan Hubbard | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: George E. Jacobs, IV | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.