San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al v. United States Department of Interior et al
| San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and Westlands Water District |
| United States Department of Interior, Kenneth Lee Salazar, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Rowan W. Gould, Ren Lohoefener, United States Bureau of Reclamation, Michael L. Connor and Donald R. Glaser |
| Save San Francisco Bay Association |
| 1:2011cv00952 |
| June 9, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Gary S. Austin |
| Oliver W. Wanger |
| Environmental Matters |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
133
FOURTH STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND OTHER EXPENSES signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on July 13, 2016. (Munoz, I)
|
|
Filing
131
THIRD STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND OTHER EXPENSES signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on April 12, 2016. (Munoz, I)
|
|
Filing
129
SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND OTHER EXPENSES signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on February 17, 2016. (Munoz, I)
|
|
Filing
127
STIPULATION and ORDER regarding 120 MOTION for ATTORNEY FEES AND OTHER EXPENSES signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/16/2015. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
115
JUDGMENT signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/25/2015. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER RE CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docs. 99,100,104) signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/2/2015. (Munoz, I)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE re Likelihood That Issues Raised in the Pending Cross Motions Will be of Practical Importance During This Water Year, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/24/2014. (The Parties are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writin g on or before July 11, 2014 why it is of practical importance for this Court to rule on the pending motions in this case before the end of the water year (September 30, 2014). The parties are directed to file a brief joint response to this order to show cause.)(Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER Denying Plaintiffs' 83 Motion for Limited Discovery Without Prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/22/2013. (Martinez, A)
|
|
Filing
79
STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request allowing defendants to lodge copies of the administrative records on CD-ROMs, which will be lodged with the Clerk of the Court and served on plaintiffs' counsel. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 2/12/2013. (Rooney, M)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF STANDING AND FOR FAILURE TO CHALLENGE A FINAL AGENCY ACTION 69 signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on October 17, 2012. (Munoz, I)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER DENYING 56 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/25/2012. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER Requesting Supplemental Declarations, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/5/2012. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
49
FINDINGS of FACT and CONCLUSIONS of LAW re: Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, signed by Senior Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 9/6/2011. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
46
Joint STIPULATION and ORDER for extension of time for defendants' answer, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 8/4/2011. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER Setting Hearing and Briefing Schedule Regarding Motions For Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 6/13/2011. ( 8 Motion For Temporary Restraining Order and 9 Motion for Preliminar y Injunction set for hearing 6/15/2011 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (OWW) before Judge Oliver W. Wanger. Any opposition papers shall be filed and served on or before 6/14/2011 at 3:00PM, Plaintiffs may present arguments in reply at the hearing. No additional bond beyond that required for any temporary restraining order shall be required, subject to further order of the Court.) (Gaumnitz, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
