Schultz v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Plaintiff: Kenneth Schultz
Defendant: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and J. Kim
Case Number: 1:2011cv00988
Filed: June 15, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Seng
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER Dismissing Action and Closing Case, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/9/16. CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M)
February 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER Following Settlement; VACATING Dates and Directing Parties to File Dispositive Documents, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/4/16: 60-Day Dispositional Documents Deadline. (Hellings, J)
January 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER Requiring Production of Plaintiff for Continued Settlement Conference on February 19, 2016, at 1:00 P.M., signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/28/16. (Hellings, J)
December 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER & WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 12/4/15. (Marrujo, C)
November 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 84 ORDER Adopting 79 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS to: (1) DENY Plaintiff's 51 Motion for Summary Judgment (2) DENY Defendants 71 Motion for Summary Judgment (3) GRANT Plaintiff's 77 Motion for Correction signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/17/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
September 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 79 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to: 1) Deny Plaintiff's 51 Motion for Summary Judgment; 2) Deny Defendant's 71 Motion for Summary Judgment; 3) Grant Plaintiff's 77 Motion for Correction; Fourteen (14) Day Objection Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 9/14/2015. Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Objections to F&R due by 10/1/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
September 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER GRANTING Defendant's Renewed Motion to Stay Action Due to Military Duty 63 ; Action STAYED to and Including April 1, 2015; Status and Scheduling Conference set for 5/7/2015 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 9/29/14. (Hellings, J)
August 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER denying 59 Motion to Stay signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/21/2014. (Lundstrom, T)
July 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Request for Discovery Subpoena 54 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/21/14: Request is DENIED without prejudice. (Hellings, J)
June 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER GRANTING Defendant's 52 Motion to Modify Scheduling Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 6/24/2014. Dispositive Motions Due by September 12, 2014. (Marrujo, C)
February 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER Striking Second Amended Complaint as Unathorized re 42 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/16/14. (Gonzalez, R)
November 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER Adopting 38 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DENYING Defendant's 30 Motion to Dismiss Certain Claims for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies; Case to Remain Open signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/20/2013. (Sant Agata, S)
October 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 38 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Denying Defendant's 30 MOTION to DISMISS Certain Claims for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/29/13. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections Due Within Fourteen Days. (Gonzalez, R)
October 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER Denying Without Prejudice Plaintiff's 31 Motion for Appointment of Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/11/13. (Gonzalez, R)
March 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER DENYING Motion for Appointment of Counsel 19 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/18/13: Motion is DENIED without prejudice. (Hellings, J)
April 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER DISMISSING Plaintiff's Action (Strike) for Failure to State a Claim; Clerk to CLOSE CASE; Dismissal is Subject to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 4/21/2012. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schultz v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Schultz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?