Nogueras v. Biter
Petitioner: Eugenio Luis Nogueras
Respondent: Martin D. Biter
Case Number: 1:2011cv01006
Filed: June 17, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Tulare
Presiding Judge: Jennifer L. Thurston
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER Granting Respondent's 12 Motion to Dismiss the Petition; Dismissing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; ORDER DECLINING TO ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; ORDER Directing Clerk of the Court to Enter Judgment and Close the File signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 02/02/2012. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nogueras v. Biter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Martin D. Biter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Eugenio Luis Nogueras
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?