Hill v. Gonzalez et al
Plaintiff: Ronnell Hill
Defendant: F. Gonzalez and T. Peterson
Case Number: 1:2011cv01071
Filed: June 28, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Kern
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Seng
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 55 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 50 Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice be GRANTED, 48 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED and this Action be DISMISSED re 8 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 9/28/2015. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A)
June 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 43 ; DENYING REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS re 45 AND REQUIRING DEFENSE COUNSEL TO NOTIFY COURT OF COMPLIANCE WITH 41 signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 6/5/2015. (Filing Deadline: 6/22/2015). (Lundstrom, T)
April 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY re 40 AND ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SHE SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED FOR FAILING TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY REQUEST signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 4/29/2015. (Show Cause Response due by 5/14/2015). (Lundstrom, T)
April 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 36 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 4/13/2015. (Jessen, A)
October 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER DENYING 34 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/17/2014. (Jessen, A)
July 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER ADOPTING 29 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and ORDER DENYING 17 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/31/2014. (Jessen, A)
July 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 29 FINDINGS And RECOMMENDATIONS Denying Defendant's Motion To Dismiss (ECF No. 17 ), Fourteen Day Objection Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/11/2014. F&R referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 7/30/2014. (Fahrney, E)
June 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER GRANTING 27 Motion to Strike 26 Plaintiff's Sur-Reply to Motion to Dismiss signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 6/27/2014. (Jessen, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hill v. Gonzalez et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronnell Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: F. Gonzalez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. Peterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?