Vargas v. Lonigro et al
| Raul Vargas |
| Anthony S. Lonigro, R. Taherpour, Randolph Wilson, III and A. Manasrah |
| 1:2011cv01171 |
| July 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Dennis L. Beck |
| Anthony W. Ishii |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Dismissal of 1 Action for Failure to Obey Court Order and Failure to State a Claim; Objections Due within 14 Days signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 4/20/2013. Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Objections to F&R due by 5/9/2013. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why this Action should not be Dismissed for Failure to Obey a Court Order and Failure to State a Claim; Response Due within Fourteen Days signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 3/5/2013. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER ADOPTING 18 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and GRANTING Defendants' 14 Motion to Dismiss, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/22/13. Plaintiff is Granted Leave to File an Amended Complaint Within Thirty (30) Days. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
18
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Defenants' 14 MOTION to DISMISS be Granted, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/13/12. Referred to Judge O'Neill; Objections, if any, due within fourteen days. (Verduzco, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
