Nettles v. Lopez
| Damous D. Nettles |
| Raul Lopez |
| 1:2011cv01201 |
| July 20, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Anthony W. Ishii |
| Jennifer L. Thurston |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
ORDER DISMISSING Action for Failure to Comply with the Court's Orders, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/25/17. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
73
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this action be DISMISSED, with prejudice, for Plaintiff's failure both to obey a court order and to prosecute this action ;referred to Judge Ishii, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 08/30/17. Objections to F&R due by 9/25/2017(Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why the Action Should Not be Dismissed for Plaintiff's Failure to Comply With the Court's Order signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/21/2017. Show Cause Response due within twenty-one (21) days. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER GRANTING 62 Request to Recharacterize this Action as a "PC" Case; ORDER GRANTING 63 Request for Counsel to Withdraw; ORDER DENYING Request for Appointment of Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 2/14/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER granting second motion to extend time 60 signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 2/7/2017. (Filing Deadline: 2/24/2017).(Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER to extend time for Petitioner to elect whether to recharacterize his Petition as an Action Under 42 U.S.C. 1983 signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/7/2016. (Filing Deadline: 12/5/2016).(Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER to Petitioner to Notify the Court Whether He Wishes His Habeas Petition to be Recharacterized as an Action Brought Under 42 U.S.C. 1983 signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/22/2016. 45-day deadline. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
47
CJA 20 ORDER Appointing Attorney John Paul Balazs for Damous D. Nettles signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/16/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
30
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending that the 27 Motion to Dismiss be Granted and the 1 Habeas Corpus Petition be Dismissed for Lack of Habeas Jurisdiction signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/31/2011. Referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii. Objections to F&R due by 11/23/2011. (Sant Agata, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nettles v. Lopez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Damous D. Nettles | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Raul Lopez | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Robert Woodrow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
