Mitchell v. Pena, et al.
| John Edward Mitchell |
| R. Indemill, Pena, H.A. Sumaya, T. Cano, B. Albitre and Marlene Smith |
| 1:2011cv01205 |
| July 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Jennifer L. Thurston |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
ORDER to Defendants to file a Status Report regarding Settlement signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/11/2014. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER Dismissing Action with Prejudice per Stipulation, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/24/14. CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 66 67 Motions for SATF Warden to Produce his Personal and Legal Property as Moot signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 06/11/2014. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER denying 61 Motion to Amend the Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/30/2014. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER & WRIT of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum for Plaintiff John Edward Mitchell (CDCR# H-38255), signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 4/28/2014. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Request to Correct the Spelling of Defendant "Pena" to "Pina" 56 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/13/14. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 40 Motion to Serve Additional Interrogatories on Defendant Sumaya signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/26/2013. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER STRIKING Plaintiff's Notice/Letter From the Docket in This Case 34 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/14/13. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to Provide Additional Information to Effecuate Service of Process to R. Indermill (aka R. Indemill), signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/20/13. Fourteen-Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 27 Second Motion for an Order Directing Service as MOOT, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/19/2013. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER ADOPTING In Full the 23 Findings and Recommendations DENYING Defendant Sumaya's 20 Motion to Dismiss; ORDER for Defendant Sumaya to Answer OR Otherwise Respond to the Complaint Within 21 Days, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/5/2013. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 24 Motion for an Order Directing Service as Moot signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 07/30/2013. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER Directing the Clerk of the Court to Assign this Matter to the Appropriate District Judge; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Denying Defendant Sumaya's 20 Motion to Dismis signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 07/12/2013. Referred to Judge O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 8/1/2013. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 18 Motion for Mediation signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/30/2012. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 10 Motion to File First Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/2/2011. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER Discharging Order To Show Cause (Doc. 6 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/26/2011. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why this Action Should not be Dismissed signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 09/11/2011. Show Cause Response due by 9/29/2011. (Flores, E)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
