Hissong v. Tulare County, et al.
Timothy Earl Hissong, Sr. |
Tulare County and California Department of Corrections |
1:2011cv01397 |
August 22, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Monterey |
Lawrence J. O'Neill |
Sheila K. Oberto |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ORDER Dismissing Miscellaneous Motions (Docs. 14 , 20 , 21 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/1/2012. (Fahrney, E) |
Filing 26 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION Regarding Dismissal of Successive Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 USC 2244(b), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/19/12. Referred to Judge O'Neill. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 25 ORDER Directing Clerk of the Court to Redesignate Case as a Habeas Corpus Action, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/17/12. New Case Number 1:11-cv-01397-LJO-BAM (HC).(Verduzco, M) |
Filing 24 ORDER Adopting Findings and Recommendations 22 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/27/11. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 11 ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of The Court to Administratively Redesignate Case as a Regular Civil Action and Assign a District Judge, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/9/11. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 10 ORDER Denying Motion For Appointment Of Counsel (Document # 5 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/9/2011. (Fahrney, E) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.