Harris v. O'Keefe et al
Christopher L. Harris |
Donald O'Keefe and U.S. Marshall |
1:2011cv01553 |
September 14, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Merced |
Dennis L. Beck |
Lawrence J. O'Neill |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 ORDER REVOKING Plaintiff's In Forma Pauperis Status on Appeal, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/9/2011. cc: Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 25 ORDER Adopting 20 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Application For Writ of Habeas Corpus and 19 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/18/11. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 20 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 18 Plaintiff's Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 19 Motion for Preliminary Injunction be DENIED re 6 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 10/4/2011. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due within twenty-one (21) days. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 15 ORDER Regarding Motion For Leave To File An Amended Complaint (Doc. 5 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 9/26/2011. (Fahrney, E) |
Filing 8 ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Redesignate Action as a Regular Civil Case, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 9/20/2011. (Marrujo, C) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.