United States of America v. Bishop
United States of America |
Norman D. Bishop |
1:2011cv01604 |
September 21, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Fresno |
Lawrence J. O'Neill |
Michael J. Seng |
Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
26 U.S.C. ยง 7402 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 ORDER CLOSING FILE re Notice of Compliance signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/29/2013. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 26 ORDER TO APPEAR signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on December 10, 2012. (Munoz, I) |
Filing 23 ORDER FINDING Respondent in Civil Contempt of Order Filed February 8, 2012 and November 8, 2012 signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/3/2012. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 18 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/8/2012. Show Cause Hearing set for 12/3/2012 at 08:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Show Cause Response due by 11/15/2012. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF INTENT TO CLOSE ACTION signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/7/2012. (Filing Deadline: 11/16/2012).(Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 13 ORDER ADOPTING 11 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the IRS Summons Issued to Norman Bishop be Enforced signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/8/2012. The United States shall notify the Court regarding Respondent's compliance with this order. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 11 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that the IRS summons issued to respondent, Norman Bishop, be enforced and that respondent be ordered to appear at the IRS offices on the 21st day after the filing of the District Judge's summons enforcem ent order, or at a later date to be set by the Revenue Officer, to give testimony and to produce documents for examination, and that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce its order by its contempt power. These findings are referred back to District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill for review with objections to same due by 2/7/2012; order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/23/2012. (Rooney, M) |
Filing 6 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Hearing set for 1/13/2012 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng. Show Cause Response due by 12/23/2011. signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/20/2011. (Yu, L) |
Filing 4 AMENDED ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Hearing set for 11/18/2011 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng. signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 09/27/2011. (Yu, L) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: United States of America v. Bishop | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Yoshinori H. T. Himel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Norman D. Bishop | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.