Rapalo v. Lopez, et al.
| Walter Rapalo |
| S. Lopez, Huang, - Schaffer, Shittu, A. Manasrah, I Grewel and L. Bluford |
| 1:2011cv01695 |
| October 11, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Barbara A. McAuliffe |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
130
ORDER Partially Granting Plaintiff's 129 Motion for Extension of Time to Object to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/27/117. Objections Due: 05/01/2017. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
126
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Plaintiff's unauthorized surreply 122 be STRICKEN from the record; Defendants Lopez and Manasrah's Motion for Summary Judgment 94 be Granted re 94 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by S. Lopez, A. Manasrah ; referred to Judge O'Neill,signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 03/8/17. Objections to F&R due 14-Day Deadline (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
125
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS that Plaintiff's 100 Motion for the Court to Appoint a Neutral Expert for Summary Judgment be Denied; Plaintif's Motion to Strike be Denied and Defendant Schaefer's 93 Motion for Summary Judgment be Granted signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 03/03/2017. Referred to Judge O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 3/20/2017.(Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 77 Motion Requesting Leave to Depose a Non-Party by Written Deposition, and Request to Serve Subpoena signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 03/11/2016. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 84 Motion for Reconsideration by District Court of Magistrate Judge's Ruling of ECF No. 72 signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/4/2016. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion For Leave To Amend (ECF No. 59 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/27/2015. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 52 Motion for Leave to Amend and File a Second Amended Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/9/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 44 Application for an Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Discovery Requests, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 12/19/15. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 36 Motion to Compel Production of Documents signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/07/2014. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER Granting Defendants' 38 Motion to Modify the Discovery and Scheduling Order signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/17/2014. Dispositive Motions filed by 1/16/2015.(Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER Denying 34 Motion for Subpoenaed Documents without Cost, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/18/14. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER Denying 30 Motion for Appointment of Counsel without Prejudice, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/15/14. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER Discharging Order to Show Cause signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 02/28/2012. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER to FILE Consent or Decline Form or SHOW CAUSE Why this Action should not be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute; Twenty Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/19/2012. Show Cause Response due by 2/13/2012. (Sant Agata, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
