Traeger et al v. United States Postal Service et al
| Janice Traeger and Philip Traeger |
| United States Postal Service and Phillips West Coast Properties LLC |
| 1:2011cv01747 |
| October 19, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dennis L. Beck |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Other Personal Injury |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER to DISMISS and to CLOSE Action 26 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/11/13: This entire action is DISMISSED with prejudice. (CASE CLOSED) (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT 23 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/03/12. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER to Dismiss Claims, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/26/12. Philip Traeger terminated. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER OF DISMISSAL of Defendant, Phillips West Coast Properties LLC crossclaim against United States Postal Service signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/4/2012. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
7
Application and Declaration to Continue Mandatory Scheduling Conference and ORDER Thereon,signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 1/23/2012. ( Initial Scheduling Conference previously set for 1/26/2012 has been CONTINUED to 4/17/2012 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (DLB) before Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck) (Figueroa, O)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
