Rocha v. State of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Plaintiff: Linda Rocha
Defendant: State of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, J. Clark Kelso and California Correctional Health Care Services
Case Number: 1:2011cv01954
Filed: November 18, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Barbara A. McAuliffe
Presiding Judge: Lawrence J. O'Neill
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 451
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 38 JUDGMENT on Acceptance of F.R.Civ.P. 68 Offer signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/26/2013. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
October 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 28 STIPULATION and ORDER Permitting Plaintiff to File First Amended Complaint: (1) Plaintiff's request for leave to file a First Amended Complaint is GRANTED (Doc. 23); (2) On or before October 29, 2012, Plaintiff shall file her First Amended Co mplaint, attached as Exhibit A to the Stipulation, as a separate amended complaint in the docket for purposes of clarifying the record; (3) Defendants' Answers are due 21 days after the date of this order. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/23/2012. (Herman, H)
July 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 18 STIPULATION and ORDER re: Filing Date for Defendant's Responsive Pleading: (1) CDCR shall file their answer no later than 20 days after Plaintiff files an Amended Complaint. (2) Initial SCHEDULING CONFERENCE is continued from 8/22/2012 to September 20, 2012 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/24/2012. (Herman, H)
April 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER Continuing Scheduling Conference: Initial SCHEDULING CONFERENCE is continued from 4/9/2012 to Monday, June 25, 2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/5/2012. (Herman, H)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rocha v. State of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Linda Rocha
Represented By: William Anthony Romaine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Clark Kelso
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Correctional Health Care Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?