Ronlake, et al. v. US-Reports, Inc., et al.
Plaintiff: Thor Ronlake and Paula Ronlake
Defendant: US-Reports, Inc. and Group Management 0002 LLC
Case Number: 1:2011cv02009
Filed: December 5, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Fresno
Presiding Judge: Lawrence J. O'Neill
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Seng
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER to DISMISS and CLOSE Action 69 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/2/13: The entire action is DISMISSED with prejudice; All pending dates and matters are VACATED; and The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this action. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
August 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 67 STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request continuing the non-expert discovery deadline to 10/4/2013. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/15/2013. (Rooney, M)
March 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 64 STIPULATION and ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY CUT-OFF DATE TO AUGUST 28, 2013, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/6/2013. (Yu, L)
February 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEYS, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/26/2013. (Yu, L)
September 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTION (Doc. 50) signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on September 25, 2012. Motion Hearing currently set for 10/2/2012 before Judge O'Neill is VACATED. (Munoz, I)
May 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER denying 23 Motion to Dismiss ; denying 27 Motion to Strike, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 5/7/2012. (Kusamura, W)
February 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER Re Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint 7 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/6/12. Motion Denied. Answer Due 02/21/2012. (Gonzalez, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ronlake, et al. v. US-Reports, Inc., et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thor Ronlake
Represented By: Peter Sean Bradley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paula Ronlake
Represented By: Peter Sean Bradley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US-Reports, Inc.
Represented By: Stacey McKee Knight
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Group Management 0002 LLC
Represented By: Deborah Faye Birndorf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?