O'Connell v. Kern Valley State Prison et al
| Kevin P. O'Connell |
| C. Chen, Kern Valley State Prison, T. Rodriguez, M. Northcutt, L. Howard, M. Betzinger and S. Lopez |
| 1:2011cv02163 |
| December 30, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Barbara A. McAuliffe |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER GRANTING Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Unauthorized Surreply and DENYING Plaintiff's Request for Leave to File a Surreply 38 , 41 ; ORDER GRANTING Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies 29 ; ORDER DENYING Motion for 60-Day Extension of Time as MOOT 43 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/14/13: This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Request For Default Judgment (ECF No. 22 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/15/2012. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion To Include Exhibit (ECF No. 12 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/1/2012. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER DENYING Motion for Appointment of Counsel 3 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/5/12: Motion is DENIED without prejudice. (Hellings, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
