Trustees on Behalf of the Northern California General Teamsters Security Fund v. Fresno French Bread Bakery et al
Plaintiff: Trustees on Behalf of the Northern California General Teamsters Security Fund
Defendant: Fresno French Bread Bakery and Alvin Lewis
Case Number: 1:2012cv00187
Filed: February 9, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Fresno
Presiding Judge: Barbara A. McAuliffe
Presiding Judge: Lawrence J. O'Neill
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER to DISMISS and CLOSE Action 68 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/16/14: Based on the parties stipulation for dismissal under F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this Court DISMISSES with prejudice this entire action and all claims. (Hellings, J)
August 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 67 STIPULATION and ORDER to DISMISSAL without Prejudice and to Retention of Jurisdiction by the Court signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/13/2013. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
July 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER After Settlement, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/26/13. (Verduzco, M)
January 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 57 STIPULATION and ORDER to Continue Discovery Deadlines: Non-Expert Discovery by 6/15/2013. Expert Disclosures by 6/1/2013. Supplemental Expert Disclosures by 6/12/2013. Expert Discovery by 7/15/2013. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/31/2013. (Herman, H)
October 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER on Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendants' Demand for Jury Trial (Docs. 21, 22, 23): this Court DENIES Plaintiffs' motion to strike Defendants' demand for a jury trial. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/24/2012. (Herman, H)
September 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER After Status Conference and Continuing Scheduling Conference. (1) Defendant's amendment to pleading shall be filed no later than 9/25/2012 and served on or before 10/10/2012. (2) Initial SCHEDULING CONFERENCE is continued to 11/6/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (3)Parties advised Court as to MJ consent by 9/26/2012. (4) SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE set for 1/22/2013 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/18/2012. (Herman, H)
August 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 37 Application (Doc. 34) for Late Filing of Pleading and ORDER: Defendants have and including 8/18/2012 to file their opposition to Plaintiff's motion to strike jury demand. Plaintiff shall file a Reply to Defendants' opposition, if necessary, by 8/24/2012. The Court has taken this matter under submission and it will not be scheduled for a hearing unless the Court determines it is necessary. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/20/2012. (Herman, H)
July 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER on Defendants' F.R.Civ.P.12 Motion to Dismiss 16 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/24/12: Trustees' ddl to comply 8/6/12; Defendant's response ddl 8/24/12. (Hellings, J)
June 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER continuing Scheduling Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/7/2012. (Initial Scheduling Conference previously set for 8/21/2012 has been CONTINUED to 8/30/2012 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe) (Figueroa, O)
June 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 18 STIPULATION and ORDER Continuing Scheduling Conference: Initial SCHEDULING CONFERENCE is continued from 7/12/2012 (previously continued from 6/25/12) to August 21, 2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe< /u>. A JOINT Scheduling Conference Report, carefully prepared and executed by all counsel, shall be electronically filed in full compliance with the requirements set forth in the Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference, one (1) full week prior to the Scheduling Conference, and a copy shall be e-mailed, in WordPerfect or Word format, to bamorders@caed.uscourts.gov. The parties may appear by telephone. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/4/2012. (Herman, H)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trustees on Behalf of the Northern California General Teamsters Security Fund v. Fresno French Bread Bakery et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trustees on Behalf of the Northern California General Teamsters Security Fund
Represented By: John C Provost
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fresno French Bread Bakery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alvin Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?