John Stewart v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Plaintiff: John Stewart
Defendant: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Case Number: 1:2012cv00221
Filed: February 15, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Stanislaus
Presiding Judge: Anthony W. Ishii
Presiding Judge: Sheila K. Oberto
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 63 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/4/14. CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M)
February 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 60 Order for Plaintiff to show cause why sanctions should not issue for failure to comply with court order, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/18/2014. Show Cause Response due by 3/7/2014. (Figueroa, O)
January 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER requiring parties to submit dispositional documents by February 7, 2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/7/2014. (Hernandez, M)
June 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 55 Stipulation and Order to continue certain deadlines, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A Boone on 06/13/2013. (Plaintiff's Expert Disclosures due by 7/3/2013; Defendant's Expert Disclosure due by 8/6/2013; Expert Discovery due by 9/10/2013; Dispositive Motions filed by 11/12/2013; Dispositive Motions heard no later than 12/20/2013) (Figueroa, O)
April 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 53 STIPULATION and ORDER to continue various deadlines. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for plaintiffs expert disclosures be continued from April 5, 2013 to June 5, 2013, that the deadline for defendants expert disclosures be continued from May 6, 2013 to July 8, 2013, that the expert discovery cutoff be continued from August 1, 2013 to September 2, 2013, that the deadline for filing non-dispositive motions be continued from August 28, 2013 to September 16, 2013, and that the dispositive motion deadline be continued from October 7, 2013 to November 11, 2013. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A Boone on 4/9/2013. (Hernandez, M)
March 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER vacating March 12, 2013 Settlement Conference. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A Boone on 3/8/2013. (Hernandez, M)
October 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER regarding the joint scheduling report regarding discovery meet and confer; order signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 10/9/2012. (Rooney, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: John Stewart v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Represented By: James Arthur Bruen
Represented By: Sandra A. Edwards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Stewart
Represented By: John Girardi
Represented By: Jeffrey Bogert, NCAED
Represented By: Mel Ira Burman Powell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?