Coach, Inc. et al v. Sac A Main, et al
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc. |
Dana Lanthier and Sac A Main |
1:2012cv00840 |
May 22, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Calaveras |
Lawrence J. O'Neill |
Sandra M. Snyder |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER Granting Injunctive Relief and Setting Stautory Damages, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/14/13. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 19 ORDER Adopting 18 Findings and Recommendations Recommending the Grant of Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment 15 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/13/12. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 18 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Judgment be entered in this action against Defendants; that an injunction issue permanently restraining Defendants from the use of any of Plaintiffs registered marks; that Plaintiffs be awarded costs and attorneys fees; and that Plaintiffs be awarded statutory benefits in an amount to be determined following Plaintiffs submission of facts and rationale forming the basis for the request for $100,000 statutorydamages; re 15 MOTION for DEFAULT JUDGMENT filed by Coach, Inc., Coach Services, Inc., 1 Complaint filed by Coach, Inc., Coach Services, Inc. ; referred to Judge O'Neill, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 11/6/2012. Objections to F&R due by 12/10/2012 (Martin-Gill, S) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.