Ghuman et al v. Wells Fargo Bank
Plaintiff: Gurvinder Ghuman and Parminder K Ghuman
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Case Number: 1:2012cv00902
Filed: June 1, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Fresno
Presiding Judge: Anthony W. Ishii
Presiding Judge: Barbara A. McAuliffe
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER GRANTING 39 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/3/2014. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
July 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER VACATING July 8, 2013 hearing date and taking matter 39 under submission, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 07/02/2013. (Figueroa, O)
April 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 32 Order to Show Cause, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 04/10/2013. Show Cause Response due by 4/15/2013. (Figueroa, O)
February 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER RE: Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint 17 , signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/12/13: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with leave to amend; Plaintiff's shall have one final opportunity to amend. (Hellings, J)
November 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER vacating hearing of November 26, 2012 and taking matter under submission. signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 11/20/12. (Nazaroff, H)
July 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER Re: 11 Motion to Dismiss Complaint, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 7/24/2012. The hearing date of August 6, 2012 is hereby VACATED. ( Amended Complaint due by 8/28/2012) (Figueroa, O)
June 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER Re: 7 Motion For Preliminary Injunction, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/15/2012. (Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction is DENIED. Accordingly, the hearing date of 6/19/2012 is hereby VACATED.)(Gaumnitz, R)
June 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER re: Ex Parte 7 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/8/2012. (Defendant's Opposition due by 6/13/2012; Plaintiff's Replies due by 6/15/2012; Oral Arguments for Motion set for 6/19/2012 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii) (Figueroa, O)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ghuman et al v. Wells Fargo Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gurvinder Ghuman
Represented By: Vicki Lynn St. John
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Parminder K Ghuman
Represented By: Vicki Lynn St. John
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?