Ross v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

Plaintiff: Theresa Ross
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank
Case Number: 1:2012cv00914
Filed: June 4, 2012
Court: California Eastern District Court
Office: Fresno Office
County: Kern
Presiding Judge: Anthony W. Ishii
Referring Judge: Jennifer L. Thurston
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 12, 2012 9 Opinion or Order of the Court STIPULATION for VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to F.R.C.P.41(a)(10(A)and ORDER, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 07/10/2012. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ross v. JPMorgan Chase Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Theresa Ross
Represented By: Raul Perez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank
Represented By: Neal A Fisher
Represented By: Carrie Anne Gonell
Represented By: Christopher M Robertson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?