James White v. Pazin et al
| James E. White |
| Mark N. Pazin, Merced County Sheriff's Department Administration, Blake, Tom Cavallero, Joe Scott, Thoreson and Blodgett |
| 1:2012cv00917 |
| June 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Merced |
| Barbara A. McAuliffe |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
ORDER Denying 84 Motion to Appoint Counsel as Moot, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/18/19. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER GRANTING 72 Motion for Summary Judgment; ORDERED Judgment In Favor of Defendant and Against Plaintiff; ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to Close this Case, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 03/29/19.CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Amend 65 ; ORDER Granting Motion to Modify Scheduling Order 66 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/12/17. Amended Complaint Due Within Fourteen Days. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER Requiring Defendant to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend and Motion to Modify Scheduling Order 65 and 66 ;ORDER VACATING October 27, 2017, Hearing Date,signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/02/2017. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER to recaption case signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/10/2017. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS to GRANT IN PART and DENY IN PART Defendants' 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss 30 , 42 , signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/16/17: This action is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings consistent with this order. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER Requiring Defendants Pazin, Merced County Sheriff's Administration, Blake, Cavallero, Scott, Thoreson, and Blodgett to Reimburse United States Marshal Within Thirty (30) Days 29 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/17/16. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER Overruling Objections to Request for Reimbursement by USM, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/31/16. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
42
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Grant in Part and Deny in Part Defendants' 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss 30 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/19/16. Case assigned to District Judge Anthony W. Ishii and Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. New Case Number: 1:12-cv-00917-AWI-BAM (PC). Referred to Judge Ishii; 30-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition within Twenty-One Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/1/15. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S REQUESTS FOR STATUS REPORT ON WHETHER US MARSHAL HAS COMPLETED SERVICE ON DEFENDANTS re 26 , 27 signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/25/2015. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER Regarding In Forma Pauperis Status on Appeal, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/13/2014. (cc: Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.) (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER DISMISSING Action With Prejudice for Failure to State a Claim 12 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 12/5/13: This terminates the action in its entirety. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
