Woodis v. Olive et al
Plaintiff: Deno Eugene Woodis
Defendant: Pam Olive, Andre King, Kathy Gaither and Department of Mental Health
Case Number: 1:2012cv01091
Filed: July 5, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Fresno
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Seng
Nature of Suit: Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 9/26/2013 recommending dismissal with prejudice 13 Second Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint. Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections due by 10/31/2013. (Lundstrom, T)
August 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER DISREGARDING 14 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/26/2013. (Jessen, A)
August 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER DISCHARGING 11 Order to Show Cause and VACATING 12 Findings and Recommendations signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/13/2013. (Sant Agata, S)
June 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 12 FINDINGS And RECOMMENDATIONS For Dismissal Of Plaintiff's Action For Failure To Prosecute (ECF No. 11 ), Objections Due Within Fourteen Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 6/20/2013. F&R's referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 7/8/2013. (Fahrney, E)
March 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Case Should Not be Dismissed for Failure to Comply With Court Order and Failure to State a Claim signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/18/2013. Amended Complaint or Show Cause Response due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A)
July 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/6/2012. (Jessen, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Woodis v. Olive et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deno Eugene Woodis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pam Olive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andre King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kathy Gaither
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Mental Health
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?